FLAGSHIP ASSESSMENT · PROPRIETARY
Most assessments tell you who you are. This one tells you who you'll become under pressure.
It's how we perform, as well as who we natively are, that matters under pressure. This assessment makes the gap visible before it shows up in a critical moment.
Built on
Five-Factor Model · Blake-Mouton conflict grid · Berne's ego-state framework
Designed for
Development conversations, not selection. Leadership coaching, change, high-stakes ops.
Output
Named strengths, the shadows they cast, and trainer-flagged combinations.
The same research foundations as MBTI, TKI, and Insights — but synthesised around one dimension those instruments don't measure: the gap between natural disposition and at-work behaviour.
That gap is the daily energy cost of operating in a way that doesn't match your default. It's also the most reliable predictor we have of how someone will behave when stress, fatigue, or conflict rise — because under pressure, the role-mask collapses back toward natural disposition, often visibly and at the worst moment.
The output isn't a four-letter type or a colour. It's an individualised reading of named strengths, the shadows those strengths cast on differently-disposed colleagues, conflict-mode patterns read across the whole profile rather than just the highest score, and trainer-flagged combinations worth surfacing in 1:1 coaching.
What it measures
The distance between who you are at rest and who you are at work — and how that gap behaves when the stakes climb.
Why it's different
Most instruments give you a stable type. This one gives you a stable type plus a forecast of how you'll deviate from it under load.
How it's used
Individual coaching, leadership team off-sites, change-readiness diagnostics, and pre-engagement onboarding for high-stakes operational roles.
What you get back
A written profile, a debrief with a senior practitioner, and — for cohorts — a team-level pattern read with named coaching opportunities.
Discuss the assessment with a senior practitioner